ISSN 2149-7893 | E-ISSN 2536-507X
Original Article
Utility of Bedside Urine Toxicology Screening Test in Emergency Department: A Retrospective Study
1 Department of Emergency Medicine, Ankara Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey  
2 Department of Emergency Medicine, Yıldırım Beyazıt University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey  
Cyprus J Med Sci 2018; 3: 98-102
DOI: 10.5152/cjms.2018.588
Key Words: Emergency medicine, toxicology screening, urine

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In this retrospective study, our goal was to describe the use of urine toxicology screening (UTS) tests in patient management in an urban training and research hospital’s Emergency Department (ED).


MATERIAL and METHODS: This is a retrospective observational descriptive file review. All patients aged ≥16 who were admitted to the ED between March 2013 and March 2017 for any complaint and who were ordered a urine drug screening test were included in the study.


RESULTS: A total of 1866 patient files were included in the statistical analysis. The median age of 1866 included patients was 29 (16–99). 66.9% (n=1248) of patients were male. Of the 1866 patients, 26.7% (n=499) tested positive for at least one drug. There was no statistically significant difference between the ward hospitalization, intensive care unit hospitalization, and discharge or death rates among patients who tested positive for at least one drug and patients who tested negative for all drugs (χ2 p=0.097). Drug positivity was significantly higher in forensic cases, in patients who attempted suicide, and in patients who were in a rehabilitation program.


CONCLUSION: The UTS testing is a controversial subject in ED. Our results do not support its use with clinical curiosity being the only reason to order the test. The UTS testing may be more useful in targeted populations in ED.

Cite this article as
: Pamukcu Gunaydin G, Kurtoglu Celik G, Ersen T, Sener A, Ozhasenekler A, Gokhan S. Utility of Bedside Urine Toxicology Screening Test in Emergency Department: A Retrospective Study. Cyprus J Med Sci 2018; 3: 98-102.

Key Words
Author's Corner
AVES | Copyright © 2018 Cyprus Turkish Medical Association Latest Update: 03.01.2019