Analysis of Germline Variants with Low Allele Frequencies in Turkish Healthy Cohort
PDF

Research Article

Analysis of Germline Variants with Low Allele Frequencies in Turkish Healthy Cohort

Cyprus J Med Sci 2025;10(6):376-382 DOI: 10.4274/cjms.2025.2025-99
, , , ,
PDF
Permissions

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Within a specific population, rare variants with minor allele frequencies (MAFs) below 0.01% may underlie a particular genetic disorder when Mendelian diseases are investigated. Although MAFs can be determined by universal databases, the importance of a variant with a low MAF may vary across populations. Hence, documentation of rare variants in healthy individuals could be remarkably valuable. However, such approaches have not yet been applied in the Turkish population. Thus, we aimed to identify rare germline variants in a healthy Turkish population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We re-analyzed whole-exome sequencing data from 80 healthy Turkish individuals and filtered variants using a MAF threshold of <0.01%. We further assessed the pathogenicity of the filtered variants according to the American College of Medical Genetics criteria.

RESULTS

There were numerous rare variants, some of which were common to all participants. Importantly, those variants were classified as of unknown significance or as likely pathogenic; however, this classification should be revised because the variants were observed in healthy individuals.

CONCLUSION

We propose that these variants could be benign, as they were detected in healthy Turkish participants. Finally, the rare variants in the Turkish population should still be reported to guide clinicians during routine molecular diagnosis.

Keywords: Exome sequencing, Turkish population, rare variants, minor allele frequencies

INTRODUCTION

Molecular causes of genetic disorders have been identified using genetic variants. Although many variants have been reported for specific genetic disorders, additional variants remain to be discovered. Thus, studies in human genetics focus on exploring variants associated with, or resulting in, a particular phenotype. Here, using the single-gene single-phenotype approach, Mendelian diseases are generally diagnosed by detecting rare variants in a population.

Rare variants are defined as deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) alterations with minor allele frequencies (MAFs) of less than 0.01% in a specific population. According to the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) criteria, a variant with low allelic frequency is classified with moderate piece of evidence for pathogenicity (PM2). Thus, low MAFs could be informative for evaluating the unreported variant. However, the MAF cutoff may vary between populations.Moreover, unreported or not molecularly proven variants, even those with low MAFs, are classified as variants of unknown significance (VUS), which limits molecular diagnosis.

To determine the pathogenicity of a variant, population databases are required. Although global databases such as gnomAD, ExAc, and 1000 Genomes Project are available, some countries have established population-specific databases to reduce biases arising from population-based differences.-Similarly, Türkiye has reported a whole-exome and whole-genome database and launched a portal for variant search (https://tgd.tuseb.gov.tr/) based on data from healthy participants. Nonetheless, the portal allows only single-variant searches, restricting cumulative evaluation of variants with low MAFs. Moreover, some variants of interest were not listed in the database. Hence, a more comprehensive report on variants with low frequencies in healthy cohorts is still needed.

In the present study, we re-analyzed whole exome sequencing (WES) data from 80 healthy Turkish individuals with respect to rare variants. After filtering the variants according to MAF values (<0.01%) from universal databases, we used the Franklin by Genoox tool (https://franklin.genoox.com/)to clarify variant pathogenicity according to ACMG criteria and listed the non-benign variants. Our results indicated that numerous variants had low MAFs, including variants in critical genes that were classified as VUS or likely pathogenic (LP). However, the proportion of those variants in the healthy cohort led to the conclusion that those variants, especially those linked to early-onset genetic disorders, should be re-categorized as benign in the Turkish population. The present study is the first to underscore the importance of rare variants in healthy individuals in the Turkish population, and such studies are still required.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethics and Participants

In the present study, the WES data previously obtained from 80 healthy individuals in the sport genetics studies15,16  were re-analyzed. In previous studies, only polymorphisms of the participants were evaluated using an exome-wide association study. Sixty participants were elite Turkish athletes, and twenty were healthy, unrelated Turkish individuals. In the present study, all participants (27 females, 33.75%; 53 males, 66.25%; age >18 years) were regarded as healthy individuals and were not grouped, as none had any known (declared) genetic disorders. The study was approved by the Gazi University Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee (approval number: 09, date: 05.04.2021). Under this ethical approval, all variants were already approved for analysis. Both written and verbal consents were obtained from the participants before the study. Moreover, the data were publicly available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24496216.v1.

Variant Prioritization

In the study, data generated by WES, which was performed using the Twist Human Comprehensive Exome Panel (Twist Biosciences, USA) and the Illumina NextSeq500 (Illumina Inc., USA) on genomic DNAs from peripheral blood samples of the participants, were further examined. For the analysis of rare variants, the variants in variant call format for each participant were annotated using the ANNOVAR tool with the hg19 human reference genome. Next, variants located in exons or exon-intron boundaries were prioritized using VarAFT software, where variants with read depth >10 were filtered by MAF <0.01%, considering only morbid genes. To limit the number of variants and to avoid manipulating any possible de novo variants, only homozygous variants were evaluated, while hemizygous or homozygous variants on chromosome X were documented regardless of participant sex. Finally, the pathogenicity of the variants was determined using the Franklin by Genoox tool (https://franklin.genoox.com/) according to the ACMG criteria. Moreover, we queried the Turkish Genome Project (TGP) database (TGP; https://tgd.tuseb.gov.tr/) for each variant, using a single-variant search when the variant was listed, and excluded variants reported in the database.

Statistical Analysis

No statistical analysis was performed in the study.

RESULTS

Each participant had nearly 700,000 variants before filtering. Applying a MAF <0.001 filter to homozygous variants in morbid genes yielded approximately 15 variants per patient. Variant assessment using Franklin by Genoox according to the ACMG criteria showed approximately three variants per patient classified as VUS or LP; on average, one such variant per patient was not documented in the TGP database. Those variants listed in were detected in at least one participant. Variants that met ACMG criteria BS2 (observed in a homozygous state in population databases more than expected for disease), BS3 (well-established functional studies show no damaging effect on protein function or splicing), BP3 (in-frame deletions/insertions in a repetitive region with no known function), or BP6 (reported as benign but lacking evidence for independent laboratory evaluation), as well as variants classified as VUS by the Franklin tool were not reported in the results.

Table 1. List of the rare variants with VUS or LP classification and not reported in the TGP database in 80 healthy participants

Gene

Variant

Depth/allele frequency

Pathogenicity

ACMG Criteria

Disease, inheritance pattern (OMIM#)

-

ADAMTS17

NM_139057.4: c.353G>A: p.Arg118His

11/0.91

VUS

PM2, BP4

-Weill-Marchesani 4 syndrome, AR (613195)

-

ADGRG6

NM_198569.3: c.2906G>A: p. Arg969Gln

38/1.0

VUS

PM2

Lethal congenital contracture syndrome 9, AR (616503)

-

ASPM

NM_018136.5: c.8357C>T: p.Ala2786Val

53/1.0

VUS

PM2, BP4

-Microcephaly 5, primary, AR (608716)

-

ASPN

NM_017680.5: c.153_154insTGATGA: p.Asp52*

27/1.0

VUS

PM2

-{Lumbar disc degeneration}, ? (603932)

-{Osteoarthritis susceptibility 3}, AD, (607850)

-

ATXN1

NM_001128164.2: c.678_679insGCA: p.His226_Leu227insAla

75/0.91

VUS

PM2, PM4

-Spinocerebellar ataxia 1, AD (164400)

-

ATXN3

NM_004993.6: c.916_917insCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCA

GCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAG: p.Gln305_Gly306insAlaAlaAlaAlaAlaAla

AlaAlaAlaAlaAlaAlaAla

85/0.98

VUS

PM2, PM4

-Machado-Joseph disease, AD (109150)

-{Parkinson disease, late-onset, susceptibility to}, AD (168600)

-

NM_004993.6: c.917_918insC: p.Asp307Glyfs*11

79/0.96

VUS

PM2

-

BPTF

NM_182641.4: c.8027_8028insCCTCCAGCCCCTCCAGCC: p.Ala2676_Pro2677insLeuGlnProLeuGlnPro

60/1.0

VUS

PM2, PM4

-{Kaposi sarcoma, susceptibility to}, AD (148000)

-Neurodevelopmental disorder with dysmorphic facies and distal limb anomalies, AD (617755)

-

CNTNAP1

NM_003632.3: c.2992+10G>C

18/1.0

VUS

PM2, BP4

-Hypomyelinating neuropathy, congenital, 3, AR (618186)

-Lethal congenital contracture syndrome 7, AR (616286)

-

DIP2B

NM_173602.3: c.1122G>T: p.Leu374Phe

28/1.0

VUS

PM2, PP2

-Intellectual developmental disorder, autosomal dominant, FRA12A type, AD (136630)

-

DKC1

NM_001363.5: c.1490_1491insAAG: p.Thr497_Lys498insSer

30/0.97

VUS

PM2, PM4

-?Cataracts, hearing impairment, nephrotic syndrome, and enterocolitis 1, XLD (301108)

-Dyskeratosis congenita, X-linked, XLR (305000)

-

DLG5

NM_004747.4: c.4938C>G: p.Ile1646Met

81/1.0

VUS

PM2, BP4

-Yuksel-Vogel-Bauser syndrome, AR (620703)

-

DMD

NM_004006.3: c.5788C>T: p.Arg1930Cys

32/1.0

VUS

PM2

-Becker muscular dystrophy, XLR (300376)

-Cardiomyopathy, dilated, 3B, XL (302045)

-Duchenne muscular dystrophy, XLR (310200)

-

DMXL2

NM_001378457.1: c.88-2_88-1insTTTTTTTTTTTTT

24/1.0

VUS

PVS1, PM2

-?Deafness, autosomal dominant 71, AD (617605)

-?Polyendocrine-polyneuropathy syndrome, AR (616113)

-Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy 81, AR (618663)

-

DUOX2

NM_001363711.2: c.3175C>T: p.Arg1059Cys

60/1.0

VUS

PM2, PP3

-Thyroid dyshormonogenesis 6, AR (607200)

-

FAM20C

NM_020223.4: c.951_952insACAGGTGAGCCCTTCCTT

CCTCCCTCCATCCGCG: p.Asp318Thrfs*118

44/0.98

VUS

PVS1, PM2, PM4

-Raine syndrome, AR (259775)

-

FBXL3

NM_012158.4: c.483C>G: p.Ile161Met

39/1.0

VUS

PM2

-Intellectual developmental disorder with short stature, facial anomalies, and speech defects, AR (606220)

-

FCSK

NM_145059.3: c.1873C>T: p.Arg625Trp

94/1.0

VUS

PM2

-Congenital disorder of glycosylation with defective fucosylation 2, AR (618324)

-

FLVCR1

NM_014053.4: c.1463A>G: p.Tyr488Cys

41/1.0

VUS

PM2

-Neurodevelopmental disorder with microcephaly, absent speech, and hypotonia, AR (621060)

-Retinopathy-sensory neuropathy syndrome, AR (609033)

-

FRMPD4

NM_001368397.1: c.3862C>T: p.Arg1288Trp

55/1.0

VUS

PM2

-Intellectual developmental disorder, X-linked 104, XL (300983)

-

GCM2

NM_004752.4: c.283G>C: p.Asp95His

53/1.0

VUS

PM2

-Hyperparathyroidism 4, AD (617343)

-Hypoparathyroidism, familial isolated 2, AD/AR (618883)

GFI1

NM_005263.5: c.925-3_925-2insTCTCTC

12/0.92

VUS

PM2

-?Neutropenia, nonimmune chronic idiopathic, of adults, AD (607847)

-Neutropenia, severe congenital 2, AD (613107)

HTT

NM_002111.8:c.51_52insAGCAGCAGCAGCAGC:p.Phe17_Gln18insSerSerSerSerSer

74/1.0

VUS

PM2, PM4

-Huntington disease, AD (143100)

-Lopes-Maciel-Rodan syndrome, AR (617435)

INPP5E

NM_019892.6:c.1159+8_1159+9insTGGCTGGAGGGGTGGGCG

28/1.0

VUS

PM2

-Impaired intellectual development, truncal obesity, retinal dystrophy, and micropenis syndrome, AR (610156)

-Joubert syndrome 1, AR (213300)

INTU

NM_015693.4: c.1091+6A>C

32/1.0

VUS

PM2, BP4

-?Orofaciodigital syndrome XVII, AR (617926)

-?Short-rib thoracic dysplasia 20 with polydactyly, AR (617925)

JPH3

NM_001271604.4: c.430_431insTGCTGC: p.Leu143_Pro144insLeuLeu

104/0.98

VUS

PM2, PM4

-Huntington disease-like 2, AD (606438)

KCNN3

NM_002249.6: c.243_244insGCAGCAGCAGCAGCA: p.Pro81_Pro82insAlaAlaAlaAlaAla

93/1.0

VUS

PM2, PM4

-Zimmermann-Laband syndrome 3, AD (618658)

KDM5C

NM_004187.5:c.2517-6_2517-5insACT

22/1.0

VUS

PM2

-Intellectual developmental disorder, X-linked syndromic, Claes-Jensen type, XLR (300534)

KDM6B

NM_001348716.2:c.751_752insACCACC:

p.Pro250_Leu251insTyrHis

59/0.95

VUS

PM2, BP3

-Stolerman neurodevelopmental syndrome, AD (618505)

KIF4A

NM_012310.5: c.1924A>G: p.Met642Val

22/1.0

VUS

PM2, PM4

-Intellectual developmental disorder, X-linked 100, XLR (300923)

-Taurodontism, microdontia, and dens invaginatus, XLR (313490)

KLHL15

NM_030624.3: c.1805G>A: p.Arg602His

22/1.0

VUS

PM2, PP2

-Intellectual developmental disorder, X-linked 103, XLR (300982)

KRT10

NM_000421.5: c.1684_1685insAGCTCCGGCGGCGGATACGGCGGCGGCAGC: p.Ser562*

34/1.0

LP

PVS1, PM2

-?Ichthyosis histrix, Lambert type, AD (146600)

-Epidermolytic hyperkeratosis 2A, AD (620150)

-Epidermolytic hyperkeratosis 2B, AR (620707)

-Ichthyosis with confetti, AD (609165)

-Ichthyosis, annular epidermolytic 1, AD (607602)

LFNG

NM_001166355.2:c.137_138insGATG: p.Asp47Metfs*11

83/1.0

VUS

PM2

-Spondylocostal dysostosis 3, AR (609813)

LRSAM1

NM_001005373.4: c.593C>T: p.Ala198Val

67/1.0

VUS

PM2, BP4

-Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, axonal, type 2P, AD/AR (614436)

MLC1

NM_015166.4: c.1053_1054insCGGGGAGGTGAGTGGCCTGTGGGGTGGGGGTGC: p.Ala351_Gly352insArgGlyGlyGluTrpProValGlyTrpGlyCys

41/1.0

VUS

PM2, PM4

-Megalencephalic leukoencephalopathy with subcortical cysts 1, AR (604004)

NEFH

NM_021076.4:c.1939_1940insGTCCCCT

GAGAAGGCCAA:p.Ala646_Lys647insSer

ProLeuArgArgPro

95/0.97

VUS

PM2, BP4

-{?Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, susceptibility to}, AD, AR (105400)

-Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, axonal, type 2CC, AD (616924)

OGT

NM_181672.3: c.922A>G: p.Ser308Gly

33/0.97

VUS

PM2, PP2

-Intellectual developmental disorder, X-linked 106, XLR (300997)

OTC

NM_000531.6: c.76C>T: p.Arg26Trp

29/1.0

VUS

PM2, PM5, PP2

-Ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency, XL (311250)

OTOG

NM_001292063.2: c.89G>A: p.Arg30His

57/1.0

VUS

PM2, BP4

-Deafness, autosomal recessive 18B, AR (614945)

PAPPA2

NM_020318.3: c.2162A>G: p.Tyr721Cys

32/1.0

VUS

PM2

-Short stature, Dauber-Argente type, AR (619489)

PAPSS2

NM_001015880.2: c.381+1_381+2insAAAAA

12/1.0

VUS

PVS1

Brachyolmia 4 with mild epiphyseal and metaphyseal changes, AR (612847)

PCNT

NM_006031.6: c.427_428insTGGGATGTTCACAGTCAGTGACCACCCACCAGAACA: p.Arg143delinsLeuGlyCysSerGlnSerValThrThrHisGlnAsnSerSer

24/1.0

VUS

PM2, PM4

-Microcephalic osteodysplastic primordial dwarfism, type II, AR (210720)

POGZ

NM_015100.4: c.3606C>G: p.Asp1202Glu

64/1.0

VUS

PM2, PP2

-White-Sutton syndrome, AD (616364)

POLR3A

NM_007055.4: c.3503A>C: p.His1168Pro

60/1.0

VUS

PM2, PP2

-Leukodystrophy, hypomyelinating, 7, with or without oligodontia and/or hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, AR (607694)

-Wiedemann-Rautenstrauch syndrome, AR (264090)

POU3F4

NM_000307.5: c.517G>C: p.Gly173Arg

34/1.0

VUS

PM2

-Deafness, X-linked 2, XLR (304400)

PPFIBP1

NM_003622.4:c.2764A>G:p.Met922Val

72/1.0

VUS

PM2

-Neurodevelopmental disorder with seizures, microcephaly, and brain abnormalities, AR (620024)

RBM10

NM_005676.5: c.1166T>C: p.Met389Thr

34/0.97

VUS

PM2, PP2, BP4

-TARP syndrome, XLR (311900)

SEC63

NM_007214.5: c.1936-6_1936-5dup

18/.94

VUS

-

-Polycystic liver disease 2, AD (617004)

SH3BP2

NM_001122681.2: c.1507G>A: p.Glu503Lys

52/1.0

VUS

PM2

-Cherubism, AD (118400)

SLC12A2

NM_001046.3: c.284_285insGCGGCGGCGGCG: p.Ala95_Ala96insArgArgArgArg

14/0.93

VUS

PM2, PM4

-Deafness, autosomal dominant 78, AD (619081)

-Delpire-McNeill syndrome, AD (619083)

-Kilquist syndrome, AR (619080)

SLC4A10

NM_001178016.2: c.81+2T>C

49/1.0

VUS

PM2

-Neurodevelopmental disorder with hypotonia and characteristic brain abnormalities, AR (620746)

SLC44A4

NM_025257.3: c.845T>C: p.Val282Ala

73/1.0

VUS

PM2, BP4

-?Deafness, autosomal dominant 72, AD (617606)

SLC9A6

NM_001379110.1: c.1581+8T>A

32/1.0

VUS

PM2

-Intellectual developmental disorder, X-linked syndromic, Christianson type, XL (300243)

SMC1A

NM_006306.4: c.1911+3G>A

54/1.0

VUS

PM2, BP4

-Cornelia de Lange syndrome 2, XLD (300590)

-Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy 85, with or without midline brain defects, XLD (301044)

SMS

NM_004595.5: c.536G>A: p.Arg179Gln

66/1.0

VUS

PM2, PP2

-Intellectual developmental disorder, X-linked syndromic, Snyder-Robinson type, XLR (309583)

SPNS2

NM_001124758.3: c.1607+5dup

43/1.0

VUS

PM2, PP3

-?Deafness, autosomal recessive 115, AR (618457)

SV2A

NM_014849.5: c.730G>T: p.Val244Phe

57/1.0

VUS

PM2

-Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy 113, AR (620772)

TTC8

NM_144596.4: c.909G>C: p.Glu303Asp

51/1.0

VUS

PM2, PP3

-?Retinitis pigmentosa 51, AR (613464)

-Bardet-Biedl syndrome 8, AR (615985)

USP9X

NM_001039591.3: c.3496C>T: p.His1166Tyr

21/1.0

VUS

PM2, PP2

-Intellectual developmental disorder, X-linked 99, XLR (300919)

-Intellectual developmental disorder, X-linked 99, syndromic, female-restricted, XLD (300968)

WNK3

NM_020922.5: c.4870+8T>A

25/1.0

VUS

PM2

-Prieto syndrome, XLR (309610)

NM_020922.5: c.3652-8_3652-7insTTGTT

13/1.0

VUS

PM2

ZNF711

NM_001330574.2: c.547A>G: p.Thr183Ala

36/1.0

VUS

PM2, BP4

-Intellectual developmental disorder, X-linked 97, XL (300803)

VUS: Variants of unknown significance, LP: Likely pathogenic, AD: Autosomal dominant, AR: Autosomal recessive, XLR: X-linked recessive, XLD: X-linked dominant, ACMG: American College of Medical Genetics, OMIM: Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man, PVS1: Pathogenic very strong 1.

DISCUSSION

In the present study, we re-analyzed the WES data from 80 healthy Turkish individuals and documented homozygous rare variants that were recurrently observed in the participants and not reported in the TGP database. Regarding the early-onset status of diseases linked to genes harboring detected variants, we documented 62 variants in 60 genes associated with diverse genetic disorders.

Rare variants are regarded as absent from control (healthy) individuals, and their frequencies are extremely low in population-based genome databases. Thus, they are annotated with moderate evidence of pathogenicity (PM2) according to the ACMG criteria (5). Even though marking a variant with the PM2 criterion is suggestive of pathogenicity, studies have pointed out benign or likely benign variants in the presence of the PM2 criterion. Hence, reporting rare variants in healthy individuals may be useful to determine whether variants meeting the PM2 criterion are benign or likely benign. In the present cohort, 60 variants were annotated with the PM2 criterion, indicating that their frequencies were markedly low in public genome databases.

The frequency of a variant of interest can be determined using various genomic databases. Nonetheless, those databases are population-specific, and the exact frequencies vary across populations. Recently, Türkiye initiated a genome project called TGP, containing genomic information from 557 so-called healthy individuals. The platform allows users to search for individual variants of interest and provides a valuable opportunity to determine variant frequencies in a manner specific to the Turkish population. However, we noted that the platform does not document variants on the sex chromosomes, particularly indel variants. Therefore, listing rare variants in healthy Turkish individuals is fundamental to the assessment of variant pathogenicity in medical genetics in Türkiye.

Among the rare variants detected in the healthy cohort, two variants (FAM20C: NM_020223.4:c.951_952insACAGGTGAGCCCTTCCTTCCTCCCTCC ATCCGCG:p.Asp318Thrfs*118 and KRT10:NM_000421.5: c.1684_1685insAGCTCCGGCGGCGGATACGGCGGCGGCAGC:p.Ser562*) were classified as LP based on PM2 and the very strong pathogenic very strong 1 ( PVS1) criteria for pathogenicity. The PVS1 criterion applies to variant types that result in loss of protein function, including frameshifts, altered splicing, and exonic deletions. Those variants were detected in at least three healthy participants in the Turkish population. FAM20C (Golgi-associated secretory pathway kinase) encodes a protein that functions as a Golgi casein kinase, regulates phosphorylation of secreted proteins, and is linked to Raine Syndrome (Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man #259775), which is characterized by neonatal osteosclerotic bone dysplasia. However, the LP variant in the FAM20C gene was detected in five independent healthy individuals in the Turkish population, and therefore is unlikely to be the cause of lethal Raine Syndrome. Interestingly, the frameshift variant localizes to the kinase domain of the protein. Thus, further molecular studies are required to determine how protein function is conserved in the presence of this variant. The other variant in KRT10 was observed in three participants. The KRT10 gene encodes a type I keratin that is mainly expressed in epidermal cells. The mutations in this gene have been associated with rare skin anomalies. Importantly, the C-terminus of the protein was identified as a mutation hotspot., According to the ENSEMBL database, KRT10 gene (NM_000421.5) encodes a 584 amino acid-length protein. Hence, the variant detected in the healthy participants was localized to the end of the protein, which may not affect the protein’s structure and function.

During classification, unreported or unproven variants are classified as VUS. In the present study, 60 variants were classified as VUS. The classification would change when the variant is detected in healthy individuals. Therefore, we propose that the classification of those variants be re-evaluated in medical genetics in Türkiye.

In the present study, we report biallelic variants identified in healthy individuals. Among the 60 genes affected in the homozygous state, 14 have been linked exclusively to dominant genetic disorders. In specific cases, the homozygous variants in dominant diseases have been reported to be neutral, further proving the non-pathogenic nature of the listed variants.

Study Limitations

Although the study submitted variant lists for a limited number of healthy individuals, similar studies with larger group of participants or a wider sequencing approach as whole genome sequencing should be conducted to define more variants that would be reclassified in Turkish population.

CONCLUSION

The present study documented rare germline and homozygous variants in genes linked to early-onset genetic disorders in healthy Turkish individuals. Although the variants were classified as VUS or LP, their detection in the healthy cohort may indicate that those variants are benign. Moreover, the listed variants were not reported in the TGP database. Thus, reporting rare variants in a population-specific manner, as in the present study, is still valuable for guiding medical geneticists when prioritizing variants. Nevertheless, possible multigenic or multifactorial inheritance patterns should be considered when referring to those variants.

MAIN POINTS

• Rare variants are common in Turkish healthy cohort.

• The reported rare variants of unknown significance may be reclassified as benign in the Turkish population.

• Further population-based studies could facilitate variant prioritization.

Footnotes

Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: The study was approved by the Gazi University Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee (approval number: 09, date: 05.04.2021).

Informed Consent: Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the participants for allowing us to conduct the study.

Authorship Contributions

Concept: S.G.E., C.B., H.H.K., Design: S.G.E., G.A., C.B., H.H.K., Data Collection and/or Processing: C.B., H.H.K., Analysis and/or Interpretation: S.G.E., F.Y.T., G.A., H.H.K., Writing: S.G.E., F.Y.T., G.A., C.B., H.H.K.

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Financial Disclosure: The study was supported by Gazi University Rectorate (Scientific Research Projects Coordination's Unit, project number: TCD-2021-7116).

References

1

Saint Pierre A, Génin E. How important are rare variants in common disease? Brief Funct Genomics. 2014; 13(5): 353-61.

2

Johnston HR, Hu Y, Cutler DJ. Population genetics identifies challenges in analyzing rare variants. Genet Epidemiol. 2015; 39(3): 145-8.

3

Auer PL, Lettre G. Rare variant association studies: considerations, challenges and opportunities. Genome Med. 2015; 7(1): 16.

4

Goswami C, Chattopadhyay A, Chuang EY. Rare variants: data types and analysis strategies. Ann Transl Med. 2021; 9(12): 961.

5

Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015; 17(5): 405-24.

6

Shearer AE, Eppsteiner RW, Booth KT, Ephraim SS, Gurrola J 2nd, Simpson A, et al. Utilizing ethnic-specific differences in minor allele frequency to recategorize reported pathogenic deafness variants. Am J Hum Genet. 2014; 95(4): 445-53.

7

Wang J, Shen Y. When a “disease-causing mutation” is not a pathogenic variant. Clin Chem. 2014; 60(5): 711-3.

8

Gudmundsson S, Singer-Berk M, Watts NA, Phu W, Goodrich JK, Solomonson M, et al. Variant interpretation using population databases: lessons from gnomAD. Hum Mutat. 2022; 43(8): 1012-30.

9

Kobayashi Y, Yang S, Nykamp K, Garcia J, Lincoln SE, Topper SE. Pathogenic variant burden in the ExAC database: an empirical approach to evaluating population data for clinical variant interpretation. Genome Med. 2017; 9(1): 13.

10

Clarke L, Zheng-Bradley X, Smith R, Kulesha E, Xiao C, Toneva I, et al. The 1000 Genomes Project: data management and community access. Nat Methods. 2012; 9(5): 459-62.

11

Johnston JJ, Biesecker LG. Databases of genomic variation and phenotypes: existing resources and future needs. Hum Mol Genet. 2013; 22(R1): R27-31.

12

Higasa K, Miyake N, Yoshimura J, Okamura K, Niihori T, Saitsu H, et al. Human genetic variation database, a reference database of genetic variations in the Japanese population. J Hum Genet. 2016; 61(6): 547-53.

13

Lee S, Seo J, Park J, Nam JY, Choi A, Ignatius JS, et al. Korean Variant Archive (KOVA): a reference database of genetic variations in the Korean population. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1): 4287.

14

Correction for Kars et al., The genetic structure of the Turkish population reveals high levels of variation and admixture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021; 118(52): 2120031118. Erratum for: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021; 118(36): e2026076118.

15

Bulgay C, Kasakolu A, Kazan HH, Mijaica R, Zorba E, Akman O, et al. Exome-wide association study of competitive performance in elite athletes. Genes (Basel). 2023; 14(3): 660.

16

Kazan HH, Kasakolu A, Koncagul S, Ergun MA, John G, Sultanov RI, et al. Association analysis of indel variants and gene expression identifies MDM4 as a novel locus for skeletal muscle hypertrophy and power athlete status. Exp Physiol. 2025; 110(11): 1661-71.

17

Wang K, Li M, Hakonarson H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010; 38(16): e164.

18

Desvignes JP, Bartoli M, Delague V, Krahn M, Miltgen M, Béroud C, et al. VarAFT: a variant annotation and filtration system for human next generation sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018; 46(W1): W545-53.

19

Jauss RT, Popp B, Bachmann J, Abou Jamra R, Platzer K. The MorbidGenes panel: a monthly updated list of diagnostically relevant rare disease genes derived from diverse sources. Hum Genet. 2024; 143(12): 1459-63.

20

Davieson CD, Joyce KE, Sharma L, Shovlin CL. DNA variant classification-reconsidering “allele rarity” and “phenotype” criteria in ACMG/AMP guidelines. Eur J Med Genet. 2021; 64(10): 104312.

21

Qu HQ, Wang X, Tian L, Hakonarson H. Application of ACMG criteria to classify variants in the human gene mutation database. J Hum Genet. 2019; 64(11): 1091-5.

22

International HapMap 3 Consortium; Altshuler DM, Gibbs RA, Peltonen L, Altshuler DM, Gibbs RA, et al. Integrating common and rare genetic variation in diverse human populations. Nature. 2010; 467(7311): 52-8.

23

Abou Tayoun AN, Pesaran T, DiStefano MT, Oza A, Rehm HL, Biesecker LG, et al. Recommendations for interpreting the loss of function PVS1 ACMG/AMP variant criterion. Hum Mutat. 2018; 39(11): 1517-24.

24

Koob M, Doray B, Fradin M, Astruc D, Dietemann JL. Raine syndrome: expanding the radiological spectrum. Pediatr Radiol. 2011; 41(3): 389-93.

25

Xu R, Tan H, Zhang J, Yuan Z, Xie Q, Zhang L. Fam20C in human diseases: emerging biological functions and therapeutic implications. Front Mol Biosci. 2021; 8: 790172.

26

Tsubota A, Akiyama M, Kanitakis J, Sakai K, Nomura T, Claudy A, et al. Mild recessive bullous congenital ichthyosiform erythroderma due to a previously unidentified homozygous keratin 10 nonsense mutation. J Invest Dermatol. 2008; 128(7): 1648-52.

27

Takeichi T, Suga Y, Mizuno T, Okuno Y, Ichikawa D, Kono M, et al. Recurrent KRT10 variant in ichthyosis with confetti. Acta Derm Venereol. 2020; 100(14): adv00209.

28

Dyer SC, Austine-Orimoloye O, Azov AG, Barba M, Barnes I, Barrera-Enriquez VP, et al. Ensembl 2025. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025; 53(D1): D948-57.

29

Hu J, Ng PC. Predicting the effects of frameshifting indels. Genome Biol. 2012; 13(2): R9.

30

Fowler DM, Rehm HL. Will variants of uncertain significance still exist in 2030? Am J Hum Genet. 2024; 111(1): 5-10.

31

Weck KE. Interpretation of genomic sequencing: variants should be considered uncertain until proven guilty. Genet Med. 2018; 20(3): 291-3.

32

Monies D, Maddirevula S, Kurdi W, Alanazy MH, Alkhalidi H, Al-Owain M, et al. Autozygosity reveals recessive mutations and novel mechanisms in dominant genes: implications in variant interpretation. Genet Med. 2017; 19(10): 1144-50.